eGiftLaw Newsletter
November 17, 2008
Dear Professional Advisor,
Greetings from University of Northern Colorado
Foundation. I am pleased to share with you the latest news from Washington,
tax law updates, PLRs, Case Studies and timely articles. We provide this
weekly eNewsletter and web site to our professional advisor friends as a
free service. Please feel free to call me at 970-351-1380 if I can run a
proposal or be of assistance to you.
|
|
University of Northern Colorado Foundation
|
November
17, 2008
|
GiftLaw
Weekly eNewsletter - November 17, 2008
- WASHINGTON HOTLINE
- PLR THIS WEEK
- CASE OF THE WEEK
- ARTICLE OF THE MONTH
|
WASHINGTON
HOTLINE
Tax Quote of the Week
". . . For imposing Taxes on us without our
Consent . . . ."
--
The Declaration of Independence
Banking Bailout -- $290 Billion Spent, $410
Billion Remaining
Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter this week
to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben
Bernanke. He expressed concern about the progress of the bailout and the
questionable use of some government funds.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
authorized an initial $250 billion and another $100 billion at the
discretion of the President with an option for the President to request an
additional $350 billion for a total bailout amount of $700 billion. Of the
first $350 billion, Treasury distributed $125 billion for stock of large
banks and is currently seeking to distribute another $125 billion for stock
from smaller banks. Treasury also has added another $40 billion to the
bailout for AIG, the major insurance company that had issued securities to
insure against defaults on mortgage bonds.
Sen. Grassley noted that "the President can
submit a request to authorize Treasury to obtain an additional $350
billion." He continued that Secretary Paulson now plans to use the
final $350 billion "to reinvigorate the markets for credit cards,
student loans and auto loans."
The use of the final $350 billion for this purpose is
very different from the initial plan to acquire bad debt mortgage
securities from financial institutions. Sec. Paulson now calls these
"toxic assets" and plans to avoid purchasing them.
Sen. Grassley expressed concern that the funds are
not being used appropriately. He notes that only the "top five
executives" of banks are subject to salary limitations if they
participate in the Treasury bailout plan. In addition, he expressed concern
that on November 10, 2008, AIG received an additional $40 billion and
promptly spent "money on another lavish retreat in Arizona."
Sen. Grassley asked, "What is being done to
monitor the expenses of companies rescued with taxpayer dollars?"
Healthcare Reform Blueprint
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT)
held several hearings this year to consider major healthcare reform. On
November 12, 2008, he published "Call to Action; Healthcare Reform
2009."
Sen. Baucus stated, "American families -- and
our economy -- are in crisis over healthcare. We can't get coverage to the
61 million who are either uninsured or underinsured without a major
overhaul of the system and there's no way to really solve America's
economic troubles without fixing healthcare for the long term."
Because of the 46 million uninsured and 25 million
underinsured Americans, Sen. Baucus notes that families struggle to
maintain their medical care. A recent government study indicated that
adults who are ill receive care "only 55%" of the time. For
children, the rate of care during illness is even lower.
The major proposed reform by Sen. Baucus is a new
national insurance pool with the title "Health Insurance
Exchange." The Health Insurance Exchange would invite participation by
private insurers. Through Health Insurance Exchange, all Americans who are
not otherwise covered could purchase health insurance. There would be no
"discrimination based on pre-existing conditions." In addition,
for qualifying individuals and families there will be premium subsidies.
Editor's Note: Major reforms such as the
proposed healthcare reform typically occur during the first two years of a
new administration. Sen. Baucus has been developing his plan for universal
coverage for several years. However, as he notes, the plan will involve
what Washington politicians call "significant investment." The
tax increases necessary to pay for the Health Insurance Exchange were not
outlined in the plan.
90 Million eFilers in 2008
The IRS recently released the statistics on tax
returns for 2008. Over 155 million returns were filed. Nearly 90 million of
these returns were sent electronically to the IRS.
The IRS is pleased that an increasing number of
individuals file electronically. IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman indicated,
"More people with home computers and businesses embraced electronic
filing this year. Every year, more people realize that electronic filing is
the safe, accurate way for taxpayers to complete their taxes and get faster
refunds."
Another popular option is "Free File" on
the www.IRS.gov site. Taxpayers whose adjusted gross income is $54,000 or
less are permitted to use the online income tax software through the IRS
Free File System. Nearly 4.8 million returns were filed in 2008 using Free
File. This is an increase of 24% over the 3.9 million returns the prior
year.
The primary advantages to the IRS for electronic
filing are accuracy and convenience. For the taxpayer, refunds are often
more rapid. In many cases, the refunds were also made through direct
deposit to banks and other financial institutions. Of the 107 million tax
refund payments, 66 million were directly deposited into the taxpayers'
accounts. The average refund for 2008 was $2,400.
Applicable Federal Rate of 3.6% for November -
Rev. Rul. 2008-50; 2008-44 IRB 1 (17 Oct. 2008)
The IRS has announced the Applicable Federal Rate
(AFR) for November of 2008. The AFR under Sec. 7520 for the month of
November will be 3.6%. The rates for October of 3.8% or September of 4.2%
also may be used. The highest AFR is beneficial for charitable deductions
of remainder interests. The lowest AFR is best for lead trusts and life
estate reserved agreements. With a gift annuity, if the annuitant desires
greater tax-free payments the lowest AFR is preferable. During 2008, pooled
income funds in existence less than three tax years must use a 4.8% deemed
rate of return. Federal rates are available by clicking
here.
|
PLR
THIS WEEK
PLR - 200845029 Pension
Plan Assignment to Charity Excluded From Gross Income
Decedent died owning an interest in a defined benefit
pension plan ("Plan"). The beneficiary of Plan was Decedent's
estate ("Estate"), while Decedent's will named Charity as the
residuary beneficiary of Estate. Decedent's Will gave the Executor the
power to "make, partition, divi[de] or [distribute] property in
kind" and state law permitted distributions in kind as well. Estate's
Executor proposes to assign Decedent's interest in Plan to Charity as part
of Charity's residuary share of the Estate.
The Service concluded that Executor's assignment of
the Plan to Charity in partial satisfaction of its share of the residue of
Estate is not a Sec. 691(a)(2) transfer and therefore, not includible in Estate's
gross income. Income in respect of a decedent (IRD) is income not properly
includible in respect of the taxable period in which falls the date of the
decedent's death or a prior period. Under Sec. 691(a)(1)(A), if a decedent
designates his or her estate as the beneficiary of IRD, the IRD will be
included in the gross income of the decedent's estate. If, however, the
estate distributes the right to the IRD to a beneficiary of the estate, the
recipient beneficiary will include the IRD in his or her gross income
according to Sec. 691(a)(1)(B). Sec. 691(a)(2) provides that if a 691(a)(1)
right to IRD is transferred (exchanged, old, or otherwise disposed of), the
value of the IRD at the time of transfer is included in the gross income of
the transferor. Reg. 1.691(a)-4(b) explains that the transferee of an IRD
at set under Sec. 691(a)(1) will include the IRD in their gross income when
only received and Reg. 1.691(a)-4(b)(2) provides that if the asset is
transferred by an estate to a specific or residuary legatee, only the
legatee must include the IRD in gross income.
Editor's Note: The benefit in the Executor's
transfer of the IRD Plan in-kind to Charity is that although the Plan is
includible in Decedent's gross estate (because Decedent owned Plan at death),
the Plan is not includible in Decedent's gross income. Furthermore, for any
other recipient of an IRD, the IRD would be includible in the recipient's
gross income, but here it is not because Charity is a tax-exempt entity.
To view the full PLR Click
Here.
|
CASE
OF THE WEEK
Closing a Gift of
Real Estate with Little Time Left on the Clock, Year End Gifts - Part 1
Don Gregory, 60, is a very control-oriented
businessman. In fact, his business philosophy is best summed up as "my
way or the highway." While sometimes difficult to work with, Don nevertheless
has achieved substantial business success in his life. His quick
decision-making skills and solid commitment to a plan have catapulted his
company onto the Fortune 1000 list. It seems Don's "way" proved
financially fruitful over the past 20 years.
Don recently attended a seminar on charitable
remainder trusts (CRT) with his attorney, Bob Jeffers. After hearing of the
tax benefits and increased income potential of a CRT, Don turned to his
attorney and exclaimed, "I want one of those Bob - by year's
end." The date was December 21.
Don is now anxious to create a CRT, because he has a
severe tax bill looming just ahead of him. The thought of a nice, large
charitable income tax deduction excites him. In addition, Don has some
investment land that would be perfect for the CRT - the land has
appreciated significantly yet produces little income. Bob is worried,
however, that ten days is not enough time to create and fund a CRT with
real property. Of course, Bob dare not tell Don that it cannot be done.
Can Don create and fund a CRT with as little as ten
days? What steps need to be completed? What rules govern the timing of
charitable deductions?
November 7, 2008 Decide Now, Deduct Now but Give
Later
Carol Garcia is CEO, President and Founder of Widgets,
Inc. After many years of blood, sweat and tears, Widgets, Inc. has become a
very strong and established corporation. As a result, Carol has slowly cut
back her long hours at the office and has been spending more time with her
family and personal endeavors. One such endeavor is her philanthropic
goals.
Carol is actively involved with many local charities.
She has made major contributions to at least six local charities in the
past three years. Not surprisingly, she has more tax deductions than she
can handle (i.e. she has reached her AGI limits and has numerous
carry-forwards). So even if Carol decided to make a 'nondeductible' gift
this year, she has not even begun to consider what charity she should
benefit. Given the short amount of time left in the year and her excess
charitable deductions, Carol regretfully decided not to make a gift this
year.
Taking into account the time constraints and Carol's
AGI limitations, how could Carol make a gift next year, yet receive a tax
benefit for doing so this year?
To view the solution to this Case of the Week Click
Here.
|
ARTICLE
OF THE MONTH
IRA to Testamentary
Gift Annuity
IRAs and pension plans have grown dramatically in
aggregate size during the past decade. Even with the reduction in value due
to the stock markets, Federal Reserve data suggests that there is over $3
trillion in IRAs and over $12 trillion in cumulative qualified plans.
The cumulative balance in IRAs and other qualified
plans will also increase during the next decade as a result of the Sec. 408
Final Regulations. Under these regulations, minimum distributions are
relatively low. The minimum distribution rules under Reg. 1.401(a)(9)-5 use
a distribution schedule that assumes that there is an IRA owner and a
beneficiary 10 years younger. In addition to this assumption, the final
regulations use a mortality table with longer life expectancies.
As a result of the mortality table and the two-life
expectancy calculation, the minimum distribution will be substantially
below the IRA growth rate until individuals are in their mid to late 80's.
For example, if the IRA earns 7% per year, the balance will increase until
age 86 under the Uniform Table.
Age
|
Expectancy
|
Minimum Distribution %
|
70
|
27.4
|
3.7%
|
75
|
22.9
|
4.4%
|
80
|
18.7
|
5.4%
|
85
|
14.8
|
6.8%
|
90
|
11.4
|
8.8%
|
95
|
8.6
|
11.6%
|
A very favorable rule within these regulations is
that the designation of a charity or charitable trust will not affect the
minimum distribution. Thus, it is possible to select a charity, a
charitable trust or a charitable gift annuity as the designated beneficiary
of an IRA. This designation will not affect the ability of the IRA owner to
take the same minimum withdrawals.
To view the full Article of the Month Click
Here.
|
Note: Case studies, articles, commentary and other materials in the GiftLaw
system are included solely as educational information. Articles and
editorial comments are offered as an educational service to friends of this
organization, and may not always reflect our official position on any
issue. Since case studies or articles may not always reflect the current
AFR or tax law, it may be necessary to run any illustration with a current
version of Crescendo to obtain updated information. If professional
services are required, all persons shall consult with their qualified
professional advisors. Tax Quotes are courtesy of Jeffery L. Yablon,
Washington, D.C.
©
Copyright 1999-2008 Crescendo Interactive, Inc.
|
University of Northern Colorado Foundation
|
November
17, 2008
|
|
Thank you for your interest in gift planning. To access
any of this updated GiftLaw information, please select our web page by
clicking here.
Cordially yours,
George O. Pickell
Director of Planned Giving
E-mail: George.pickell@unco.edu
Phone: 970-351-1380
University of Northern Colorado Foundation
http://www.uncalumni.org/Foundation
If you do not wish to receive future emails, please click
here to unsubscribe. Thank you.
|
|